>>> Systematic reviews, end to end
From screening to a Results section you can defend.
Littview runs the entire systematic review — import, deduplicate, screen, resolve conflicts, extract, assess bias, and write — solo or with collaborators. Every decision is auditable, every AI suggestion evidence-linked. You make the calls; Littview does the busywork.
No card required · Free plan, no time limit
Product illustration: Littview reads a source PDF and fills your extraction form — abstract summary, study design, sample size, and primary outcome — linking every field to highlighted evidence in the text, with a confidence score you can accept or review.
AI Screening
Every paper pre-screened against your criteria, with a confidence score and the reasoning behind it.
Conflict resolution
Disagreements surface themselves — resolve them in one workspace, with AI as tiebreaker.
Evidence-linked extraction
AI fills your forms and shows you the exact sentence it found in the PDF.
Report writer
Methods and Results drafted from your real data, citations included. Export to Word.
Role-based access
Three roles — owners run the project, assistants help manage it, reviewers just screen and extract.
Workload balancing
Papers distributed automatically and evenly across your reviewers.
PDF viewer
Highlights, comments, and tags — right where you screen and extract.
Evidence table
Sortable, filterable, across every included study. CSV export built in.
Reusable libraries
Your criteria sets and extraction templates, saved once and reused across projects.
Notifications
In-app and email, so nothing falls through the cracks.
Solo & PhD researchers
Running a review on your own? Littview works just as well with a review team of one: you.
For solo researchers →Research groups
Invite collaborators, assign work automatically, resolve disagreements in one place.
For research groups →Evidence synthesis units
Multiple concurrent reviews, custom limits, and a dedicated plan for organizations.
For institutions →Your data,
your review.
Littview is built on infrastructure with encryption in transit and at rest, access controlled by project roles, and your results are always yours to export.
Read more about security →Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews: Which One for Which Study Design
Which critical appraisal tool fits which study design: RoB 2, ROBINS-I, Newcastle-Ottawa, CASP, JBI, MMAT, QUADAS-3, AMSTAR 2, ROBIS. Checklists linked.
Systematic Review Software in 2026: Covidence, Rayyan, Elicit, and Littview Compared
A stage-by-stage feature comparison of four systematic review tools across import, screening, extraction, risk of bias, PRISMA, reporting, and pricing, from each vendor's own documentation, checked 3 September 2026.